A White Paper on Lesson
Planning
Cliff
Schimmels
The study of lesson planning strategies in America begins in the Fourth
Century. Christian educators were
faced with two problems. They
needed to reeducate the adults who had been converted from paganism to
Christianity, but at the same time they fostered the rather novel and
controversial idea of teaching children. To accomplish this two-fold purpose,
educators developed the catechismal method of teaching.
They wrote comprehensive text materials that covered using questions in
sequential order with detailed answers. Students
then memorized both the questions and the appropriate answers with instructional
time spent in one on one recitation.
From this beginning, catechismal teaching was the dominant method of
education for the next 1,500 years. Its
reach was furthered by significant teachers such as Alcuin, chief educator of
the Charlemagne Renaissance, who developed volumes of catechismal textbooks.
Drawings of Colonial American classrooms provide a picture of the
process. Students sit on their log
desks facing the wall dutifully learning (memorizing word for word) their
lessons while one boy stands facing the school master seated on a stool holding
the stick of motivation. If the
student recites the lesson well, he is pleasantly rewarded by not being hit by
the stick.
Despite the efforts of such people as Samuel Hall and Hoarce Mann, who
developed normal schools for the training of teachers, not much change in
instructional process occurred until 1862 when Edward Sheldon, superintendent of
schools in Oswego, New York, visited Canada.
There he discovered Pestolizzean methods.
With great enthusiasm he began to implement those ideas into the schools
in Oswego and developed a normal school to train teachers. Some of his innovations included dividing students into
age-specific classes using manipulations, teaching math by taking field trips,
and utilizing class recitation rather than individual recitation.
The next major change in lesson planning and instructional process
occurred during the 1880's. When
Teacher College, New York City, merged with Columbia University, teacher
training for the first time became a college academic endeavor.
Professors assigned to the task of teaching teachers scrambled to
discover and create materials appropriate for the new academic standards.
Historians, not educators, wrote history of education textbooks.
Philosophers, not educators, wrote philosophy of education textbooks. (It is important to remember that at this time psychology was
still a very young field, so the study of psychology was not as significant in
teacher education as it is now.)
One of the two areas of concern for the professors was to find a
scientific approach to lesson planning which would not only be useful to their
students but also be academic enough to merit scholarly study. They found their answer in 1892 when students of the German
Philosopher Herbart introduced his ideas to American professors.
Based on the Herbartian concept of the mind as an appreciative mass, his
students developed a five-step lesson plan appropriate for all teachers.
It included:
1.
Preparation
2.
Presentation
3.
Association
4.
Generalization
5.
Application
The
methods professors note had something to teach and they taught it thoroughly. From 1892 until John Dewey published Democracy in
Education in 1916, this plan of American Herbartianism dominated American
education. It was not just a
possible lesson. It was the lesson
plan. Teacher manuals, plan books,
and evaluation instruments were all organized around the five-step lesson plan.
During
the 1920's and the 1930's, as the traditionalists and progressives battled for
control of American classrooms, lesson planning became a focal point of the
disagreement. Traditionalists still
found value in the structure of the five-point plan while the progressives
argued that too much planning would destroy the spontaneity that problem solving
and inquiry methodology required. The
argument continues.
During
the 1940's and 1950's, another lesson planning technique came into vogue
structured around a four step system which included:
Aim
Material
Method
Evaluation
This
four-step process became popular in teacher plan books.
Most teachers essentially, or by necessity, followed this scheme.
During
the 1960's, individualized instruction became the buzzword in American
education. Although the idea itself
had a rather short life, the principles of behaviorism in lesson planning had
been planted. When the pendulum
swung abruptly in the early 1970's from the liberalism of 1960's to the rigors
of accountability, the focus of educational theory shifted to UCLA and the
behavioristic spokespersons. Popham
and Mager taught the nations teachers to write behavioral objectives. This thrust, combined with the hold over principles of
programmed instruction, brought on a short-lived but innovative competency-based
approach to lesson planning and instructional strategies.
In
the wake that followed this spurt of behaviorism, educators looked again to UCLA
for educational practices that would meet the public demands for accountability.
During the early days of this shift, the contributions of Madeline Hunter
had gone basically unnoticed. They
were suddenly discovered in the early 1980's and Madeline Hunter's seven-step
lesson plan became the Bible for educators around the nation.
Veteran teachers learned the structure at inservice.
Education students were taught so much Madeline Hunter that they dreamed
about it at night. School boards
endorsed it, and administrators demanded it.
Every lesson had to be organized on seven steps.
Teachers were even evaluated on their use of the seven step plans and
some veteran teachers were required to be retrained in the seven steps that
include:
1.
Anticipatory
set
2.
Objectives
and purpose
3.
Input
4.
Check for
understanding
5.
Modeling,
Guided Practices
6.
Independent
Practices
7.
Closure
The
dimension of this activity was that it in many ways followed the structures and
learning principles of the Herbartian Method earlier in this century.
Other
organizations and educators borrowed heavily from the Madeline Hunter model to
construct a lesson scheme of their own. Thus,
in Tennessee, we have the Tennessee Instructional Model (TIM), based on the
learning principles of Madeline Hunter but featuring modifications of form.
During
the 1990's, many educators across the nation have moved away from the Madeline
Hunter model with their reasons focused in two areas.
First, it was misused. Madeline
Hunter never intended for her model to be prescriptive.
Her intention was to describe what she saw good teachers do.
Unfortunately her fans in administration carried in much further then
that and made the Seven Steps of Mastery Teaching the requirement of all
teaching.
The
other criticism of the Madeline Hunter model offered by some is that it is too
inflexible. It does not provide
opportunities for teacher innovation nor for student spontaneity. Many educators feel that requiring teachers to adhere too
closely to any lock step model would squeeze innovation and activities out of
the lesson.
This
is the status of lesson planning at the turn of the century.
Most educators have seen the fallacies of a form which demands certain
activities, but they remember the dangers of the open-ended, non-plan days of
progressivism.
Thus,
we all experiment, explore, and through trial and error attempt to discover the
next major movement.